Call for Contributions
Do you do historical research involving knowledge as a socially determined product of human beings and activities? If so, you are involved in the history of knowledge. Whether or not you label yourself and your work in such terms, we would like to hear from you. We invite you to share some thoughts about your work on this blog.
Blog posts can be about a specific project or historical phenomenon involving the formation, transmission, circulation, or translation of knowledge. Or perhaps you would like to discuss a related book. Or reflect on the broader meaning and potential of the history of knowledge.
The last suggestion entails a variety of possible questions. What is the history of knowledge? How does it relate to other historiographical approaches and interests that inform your research? Why have you come to engage in knowledge as an object of historical analysis? What does a history of knowledge perspective help you to think about that other concepts, approaches, or methods have not made sufficiently accessible? What kinds of research do you think the history of knowledge could open up and why? What is the specific analytical potential of knowledge history? What problems do you see in the history of knowledge, whether as practiced or in terms of conceptual limitations? What differences do you see in how “knowledge” is understood in different academic or historiographical cultures?
Or perhaps you are interested in what constitutes knowledge as an object of historiographical, anthropological, or sociological interest in the first place and the relationship of knowledge to information, beliefs, and culture.
If you find these kinds of questions interesting and fruitful, please contact us about joining the discussion and review the details below.
Details
Blog posts must be original texts, unless we have explicitly discussed a rare exception and clarified the rights situation. Posts should generally be no longer than 2,000 words, although we can be flexible about these limits. Texts will be edited by an experienced editor, so people not completely at home in English can still contribute in this language.
When inquiring about a possible submission, please include a note about your academic position or qualifications or a link to your professional homepage.
Texts should generally follow U.S. spelling. Scholarly apparatus can entail weblinks, endnotes, or a combination of the two. For endnotes, simply use that function in your word processing application and follow the Chicago Manual of Style. Weblinks should be placed in parentheses after the relevant portion of the text from which you want to link.
Please keep in mind that reading a blog post is different from reading an academic book or journal article. To be sure, you can write the same basic way (or less formally, if you prefer), but note that somewhat shorter paragraphs are easier on the eyes when reading on screen.
Images can be included, but you must demonstrate that you have the right to publish them on this weblog. Rights are too complicated an issue to summarize here, but the same kinds of issues that you encounter in print are relevant here too. (Many university libraries make copyright information available on their websites.) To help us make a determination, please include the images and detailed source information with your post. If you (re)produced the images yourself, please provide details on that.
Of course, we must reserve the right to publish only those contributions that we deem suitable for this venue.
Please see our submission guidelines for further information.
OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Editors (March 31, 2017). Call for Contributions. History of Knowledge. Retrieved December 3, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.58079/12pto
